Trust & editorial
We write for committed learners — people who want story-led input, speaking reps, and level guidance they can act on today, not another vague “tips” list.
One-sentence answer
MeloLingua Editorial Team is the in-house group of language teachers, translators, and acquisition researchers who draft, fact-check, and update every educational guide on melolingua.com — using the same story-first method as the app.
Last updated:
Founder
Ismael founded Melolingua after learning across six languages and finding that repeatable real-life situations — not bigger word lists — moved his speaking forward fastest. He is based between Valencia and Lyon.
Based in Valencia & Lyon
Read the founder method noteLanguage review
Each learning language has one accountable reviewer. Ismael remains the founder and product-method author; linguistic approval belongs to the language specialists below.
Native Spanish teacher from Spain · 8+ years of experience
Francisco is a native Spanish teacher from Spain with more than eight years of experience helping learners around the world. He authored an A1–B2 grammar course and writes practical guides to common learner doubts.
French linguistic reviewer
Jérôme reviews French texts, English translations, vocabulary guidance, and comprehension questions before publication.
German linguistic reviewer
Klara reviews German texts, translations, vocabulary guidance, and comprehension questions before publication.
Italian language teacher
Chiara reviews Italian texts, translations, vocabulary guidance, and comprehension questions before publication.
What we bring
We publish a guide only when its experience, sources, and language review support a clear byline.
Language teachers, professional translators, and editors who work with real learners — not abstract curriculum decks.
We design around comprehensible input, shadowing, and chunk-based recall — the same loop that powers the MeloLingua app.
Claims about acquisition, retention, or pronunciation get checked against primary research or established references before publication.
Coverage
CEFR-aligned reading paths, beginner story lists, and language guides for Spanish, French, German, and Italian.
Read examplesPlain-English explainers on comprehensible input, shadowing, and daily session structure — with citations you can verify.
Read examplesSide-by-side reviews when a learner needs to choose between story apps, flashcard tools, or tutor-led programs.
Read examplesDigestible write-ups of acquisition studies, reading statistics, and pronunciation practice — without hiding uncertainty.
Read examplesFirst-hand experience on why MeloLingua starts from real weekly situations, story scenes, and speaking reps — labeled separately from learner case studies.
Read examplesProcess
Every draft starts with a single job: help someone finish a story session, pick a level, or improve a speaking habit.
Statistics, study claims, and CEFR band descriptions are traced to named references. Mixed evidence gets labeled as mixed.
Example sentences, level labels, and drill instructions are read by people who teach or translate in the target language.
Each article ships with publication and last-reviewed dates so you know how fresh the guidance is.
Answers
Our language team — teachers, translators, and language researchers who also shape the story library inside the app. The same people who design sessions write and review the guides.
Look for the published and last-reviewed dates near the top or bottom of each article. High-traffic guides are re-read on a rolling basis, and we update the date when claims, product details, or cited studies change.
Yes. Email [email protected] with the page URL, the passage in question, and a link to the source you think we should use. We fix factual errors promptly and note substantive updates on the page.
The team sits inside MeloLingua and informs product narrative, story leveling, and learner-facing copy. Engineering implementation is separate; this page covers how we publish educational content on the web.
Get in touch
Found a dated stat, a broken example, or a study we should cite? We read every note and fix factual errors without waiting for the next quarterly refresh.